Command Creator
A comprehensive skill for creating optimized, agent-executable slash commands in Claude Code. This skill guides you through the entire process of designing, implementing, and testing reusable workflow automation commands.
Table of Contents
Overview
The Command Creator skill helps you transform repetitive workflows into reusable slash commands that can be invoked with /command-name in Claude Code conversations. It provides expert guidance on command structure, agent optimization, and best practices to ensure your commands execute reliably and autonomously.
Purpose: Create high-quality, agent-executable slash commands with proper structure, clear instructions, and optimal tool usage patterns.
Target Users: Developers who want to:
- Automate repetitive workflows
- Document consistent processes for reuse
- Create project-specific or global automation
- Delegate complex tasks to specialized agents
When to Use This Skill
Invoke this skill when you need to:
- Create a new slash command from scratch
- Automate a workflow you find yourself repeating
- Document a multi-step process for consistent execution
- Convert manual procedures into automated commands
- Create project-specific commands for team workflows
- Build global commands for personal productivity
Trigger Phrases:
- "create a command"
- "make a slash command"
- "add a command"
- "I keep doing X, can we make a command for it?"
- "automate this workflow"
- "create a reusable command"
What Are Slash Commands?
Slash commands are markdown files stored in .claude/commands/ (project-level) or ~/.claude/commands/ (global/user-level) that get expanded into prompts when invoked.
Structure:
---
description: Brief description shown in /help (required)
argument-hint: <placeholder> (optional, if command takes arguments)
---
# Command Title
[Detailed instructions for the agent to execute autonomously]
Invocation:
/command-name [arguments]
Storage Locations:
- Project-level:
.claude/commands/my-command.md (only available in this project)
- Global/User-level:
~/.claude/commands/my-command.md (available everywhere)
Key Features
1. Intelligent Location Detection
Automatically determines whether commands should be project-level or global based on:
- Current directory git repository status
- User explicit preferences
- Command scope and purpose
2. Pattern-Based Design
Guides you through proven command patterns:
- Workflow Automation: Multi-step processes with analysis, action, and reporting
- Iterative Fixing: Continuous improvement loops (run → parse → fix → repeat)
- Agent Delegation: Complex tasks broken into specialized agent work
- Simple Execution: Direct tool or script execution with arguments
3. Agent-Optimized Instructions
Creates commands that agents can execute autonomously with:
- Imperative/infinitive verb-first instructions
- Explicit tool usage specifications
- Clear success criteria
- Concrete error handling
- Expected outcomes defined
4. Quality Assurance
Includes comprehensive best practices for:
- Proper naming conventions (kebab-case enforced)
- Argument handling and hints
- Tool restriction guidelines
- Error recovery strategies
- Progress reporting patterns
5. Bundled Reference Documentation
Provides three comprehensive reference files:
- patterns.md: Command design patterns with detailed examples
- examples.md: Real-world command implementations
- best-practices.md: Quality checklist and writing guidelines
How It Works
The Command Creator follows a structured 6-step workflow:
Step 1: Determine Location
Auto-detection Logic:
- Check if current directory is inside a git repository
- Default to project-level (
.claude/commands/) if in git repo
- Default to global (
~/.claude/commands/) if not in git repo
- Allow user override for explicit location preference
User is informed of the chosen location before proceeding.
Step 2: Show Command Patterns
Present available command patterns to help frame the conversation:
- Workflow Automation: Analyze → Act → Report (e.g., submit PR stack)
- Iterative Fixing: Run → Parse → Fix → Repeat (e.g., ensure CI passes)
- Agent Delegation: Context → Delegate → Iterate (e.g., create implementation plan)
- Simple Execution: Run command with args (e.g., code review)
User selects the closest pattern to their needs.
Step 3: Gather Command Information
Interactive Q&A to collect:
A. Command Name and Purpose
- Command name (must be kebab-case:
my-command, not my_command)
- Description for
/help output
- Purpose and scope
B. Arguments
- Does it take arguments? (yes/no)
- Required or optional?
- Argument hint format (
<required> or [optional])
C. Workflow Steps
- Specific steps in execution order
- Tools/commands to use
- Success criteria
- Error handling approach
D. Tool Restrictions
- Specific agents or tools to use
- Operations to avoid
- Context files to read
Step 4: Generate Optimized Command
Create agent-executable instructions using:
- Template structure from best-practices.md
- Imperative verb-first language
- Explicit tool specifications
- Clear expected outcomes
- Concrete examples where needed
Step 5: Create the Command File
- Construct full file path (project or global)
- Ensure directory exists (
mkdir -p)
- Write command file using Write tool
- Confirm with user:
- Report file location
- Summarize command function
- Explain invocation syntax
Step 6: Test and Iterate
- Suggest testing the command
- Wait for user feedback
- Iterate and improve based on results
- Update file with refinements
Command Patterns
1. Workflow Automation
Use Case: Multi-step processes requiring analysis, action, and reporting
Example: Submit PR stack
1. Analyze git history to identify commit stack
2. Create PRs for each commit with proper dependencies
3. Report created PRs with links and status
Key Characteristics:
- Sequential steps with dependencies
- Clear analysis phase before action
- Comprehensive final report
2. Iterative Fixing
Use Case: Continuous improvement until success criteria met
Example: Ensure CI passes
1. Run tests and capture output
2. Parse failures and errors
3. Fix identified issues
4. Repeat until all tests pass
Key Characteristics:
- Loop until success condition
- Parse errors to guide fixes
- Progress tracking across iterations
3. Agent Delegation
Use Case: Complex tasks requiring specialized agent expertise
Example: Create implementation plan
1. Gather context (requirements, codebase)
2. Delegate to subagent agent
3. Iterate on plan with user feedback
4. Save final plan to .PLAN.md
Key Characteristics:
- Use Task tool for specialized agents
- Pass relevant context to delegated agent
- Iterate on specialized agent output
4. Simple Execution
Use Case: Direct tool/script execution with arguments
Example: Code review
1. Run codex review on specified files
2. Present results to user
Key Characteristics:
- Minimal logic, direct execution
- Pass through arguments to underlying tool
- Quick feedback loop
Location Strategy
Project-Level Commands (.claude/commands/)
When to Use:
- Command is specific to this project's workflow
- Requires project-specific context or files
- Team members should share this command
- Automation tied to project structure
Examples:
/submit-stack (project's PR submission workflow)
/ensure-ci (project's test suite)
/deploy-staging (project's deployment process)
Advantages:
- Version controlled with project
- Shared across team
- Project-specific customization
Global Commands (~/.claude/commands/)
When to Use:
- Command works across any project
- Personal productivity tool
- Generic workflow automation
- No project-specific dependencies
Examples:
/codex-review (code review any files)
/create-implementation-plan (generic planning)
/git-cleanup (git maintenance anywhere)
Advantages:
- Available everywhere
- Personal customization
- Independent of project
Bundled Resources
This skill includes three comprehensive reference files in the references/ directory:
references/patterns.md
Purpose: Detailed command design patterns with implementation guidance
Contents:
- Pattern 1: Workflow Automation (Analyze → Act → Report)
- Pattern 2: Iterative Fixing (Run → Parse → Fix → Repeat)
- Pattern 3: Agent Delegation (Context → Delegate → Iterate)
- Pattern 4: Simple Execution (Run command with args)
- When to use each pattern
- Tool usage recommendations
- Real examples for each pattern
Load When: Designing the command workflow and choosing the right pattern
references/examples.md
Purpose: Real-world command implementations with full source code
Contents:
/submit-stack: Submit PR stack from git history
/ensure-ci: Iteratively fix CI failures
/create-implementation-plan: Delegate to planner agent
- Full markdown source for each example
- Annotations explaining key decisions
- Best practices demonstrated in context
Load When: Need concrete examples of how to structure specific command types
references/best-practices.md
Purpose: Quality checklist and writing guidelines
Contents:
- Command template structure
- Agent-optimized writing style
- Common pitfalls to avoid
- Quality checklist before finalizing
- Tool restriction patterns
- Error handling strategies
- Naming conventions
Load When: Finalizing command to ensure quality and completeness
Usage Examples
Example 1: Create Project-Level CI Fixer
User Request: "I keep fixing CI failures manually. Can we make a command for this?"
Skill Flow:
- Detects project-level (in git repo)
- Suggests "Iterative Fixing" pattern
- Gathers info:
- Name:
ensure-ci
- Description: "Iteratively fix CI failures until all tests pass"
- Arguments: None
- Steps: Run tests → Parse failures → Fix issues → Repeat
- Generates command with Bash tool for pytest
- Creates
.claude/commands/ensure-ci.md
- User invokes:
/ensure-ci
Example 2: Create Global Code Review Command
User Request: "Create a global command to review code with Codex"
Skill Flow:
- Detects global (user requests "global")
- Suggests "Simple Execution" pattern
- Gathers info:
- Name:
codex-review
- Description: "Review code files using Codex"
- Arguments:
<files> (required)
- Steps: Run codex review → Present results
- Generates command with codex skill invocation
- Creates
~/.claude/commands/codex-review.md
- User invokes:
/codex-review src/app.py src/utils.py
Example 3: Create PR Submission Workflow
User Request: "Make a command that analyzes my commits and creates a PR stack"
Skill Flow:
- Detects project-level (in git repo)
- Suggests "Workflow Automation" pattern
- Gathers info:
- Name:
submit-stack
- Description: "Create PR stack from commit history"
- Arguments:
[base-branch] (optional, defaults to main)
- Steps: Analyze commits → Create PRs → Report results
- Generates command with git analysis and gh CLI
- Creates
.claude/commands/submit-stack.md
- User invokes:
/submit-stack or /submit-stack develop
Best Practices
Naming Conventions
MUST use kebab-case (hyphens, not underscores):
- Correct:
submit-stack, ensure-ci, create-from-plan
- Wrong:
submit_stack, ensure_ci, create_from_plan
Argument Hints
- Use
<angle-brackets> for required arguments
- Use
[square-brackets] for optional arguments
- Examples:
argument-hint: <file-path> (required)
argument-hint: [base-branch] (optional)
argument-hint: <command> [args...] (mixed)
Agent-Optimized Instructions
Write in imperative/infinitive form:
- Correct: "Run pytest to execute tests"
- Wrong: "You should run pytest to execute tests"
Be explicit about tools:
- Correct: "Use the Bash tool to run
pytest tests/"
- Wrong: "Run the tests"
Define success criteria:
- Correct: "Continue until all tests pass (exit code 0)"
- Wrong: "Fix the tests"
Include error handling:
- Correct: "If pytest fails, parse the output to identify failing tests, then fix each one"
- Wrong: "Fix any test failures"
Tool Restrictions
Use Bash tool for:
pytest, pyright, ruff, prettier
make, npm, yarn
gt (git-town commands)
Use Task tool for:
- Specialized agents (
subagent, subagents)
- Long-running or complex delegated tasks
Avoid in commands:
- Interactive prompts (commands must be autonomous)
- User confirmation loops (unless explicit in pattern)
- Ambiguous instructions that require interpretation
Common Use Cases
Development Workflows
- Submit PRs: Analyze commits, create PR stack with dependencies
- Fix CI: Iteratively run tests, parse failures, fix issues
- Code Review: Run linters, formatters, static analysis
- Deploy: Build, test, deploy to staging/production
Project Automation
- Setup: Initialize project structure, install dependencies
- Documentation: Generate docs from code, update README
- Testing: Run full test suite with coverage reports
- Release: Bump version, create changelog, tag release
Personal Productivity
- Git Cleanup: Delete merged branches, prune remotes
- Codebase Analysis: Generate architecture diagrams, dependency graphs
- Refactoring: Apply consistent patterns across files
- Planning: Create implementation plans for features
Team Collaboration
- Onboarding: Setup development environment, clone repos
- Standards: Enforce code style, commit message format
- Knowledge: Document architectural decisions, add examples
- Review: Automated code review checks before human review
Summary
The Command Creator skill provides a comprehensive, guided workflow for creating high-quality slash commands in Claude Code. By following proven patterns, gathering detailed requirements, and generating agent-optimized instructions, it ensures your commands are:
- Reliable: Execute autonomously without manual intervention
- Maintainable: Clear structure and documentation
- Reusable: Available project-wide or globally
- Optimized: Use appropriate tools and agents for the task
Next Steps:
- Identify a repetitive workflow you want to automate
- Invoke the command-creator skill
- Follow the guided workflow to create your command
- Test and iterate based on results
- Share with your team (project-level) or use personally (global)
Get Started:
/command-creator
Or simply say: "I want to create a command that [does something]"